How CyberScore stacks up
Three honest, hand-curated side-by-sides. We don't trash competitors — we describe positioning differences and let you decide. Where claims about other products appear, they're tagged "from the public website at the time of writing" so you can update your mental model later.
CyberScore vs Detectify
Read the comparison →Detectify is an EU-based attack-surface monitoring product with a strong DAST research catalogue. Quote-based pricing for serious use.
CyberScore wins when: You want continuous monitoring on a small fleet (<25 domains) without an enterprise contract.
CyberScore vs Intruder.io
Read the comparison →Intruder is a London-based vulnerability scanner that wraps Tenable / OpenVAS engines, with monthly plans starting around £108.
CyberScore wins when: You want one tool that gives you a dated PDF audit + a public score badge + a Slack alert when the score drops — without juggling Nessus, Greenbone and a status page.
CyberScore vs UpGuard
Read the comparison →UpGuard sells third-party-risk scoring (BreachSight + Vendor Risk). Pricing is enterprise quote-based; the entry is in the four-figure range per month.
CyberScore wins when: You want to run continuous monitoring on YOUR domains (not a vendor portfolio) and pay a per-month price you can read on a website.
Skip the comparison, see it for yourself
Run a free sample scan on your own domain — no account, no credit card. See exactly what we surface from the public internet, then decide whether you want to keep evaluating.
Got a comparison correction or a competitor you'd like us to add? Email patrick@cybersco.re.